اَللّـهُمَّ كُنْ لِوَلِيِّكَ الْحُجَّةِ بْنِ الْحَسَنِ صَلَواتُكَ عَلَيْهِ وَعَلى آبائِه في هذِهِ السَّاعَةِ وَفي كُلِّ ساعَة وَلِيّاً وَحافِظاً وَقائِداً وَناصِراً وَدَليلاً وَعَيْنا حَتّى تُسْكِنَهُ اَرْضَكَ طَوْعاً وَتُمَتِّعَهُ فيها طَويلاً
أبحاث العدد:
خلاصات بحوث العدد:
الخلاصات

Summary Article: Intellecual Position of the Denier of Imam Al-Mahdi’s Narrations

Summary Article
Intellecual Position of the Denier of Imam Al-Mahdi’s Narrations

Sayed Ali Al-Musawy Al-Nasery
Translated by: Mujtaba Al-Helu

This research studies one forged issue that the Hadiths narrated about Imam Al-Mahdi (P.B.U.H) are not mentioned in the primary sources of Muslims, as Sahih Muslim and Sahih Al-Bokary, leading the path to denying the concept of the Promised Savior.
The founder of this issue is Ibn Koldun, as an attempt of denying the existence of Imam AL-Mahdi (P.B.U.H), followed by others.
This study tends to shed light on the fact that Sahih Muslim and Al-Bokary have mentioned the concept of the Promised Mahdi partially, while they have deliberately neglected a great majority of narrations in this regard, which are considered “correct” according to their conditions.
Thus, there is a biographical study of Al-Bokary and his book in this research, focusing on the forgery his book has undergone, regarding divine gifts bestowed upon Ahlulbait (P.B.U.T).
This paper moves, afterwards, to a biographical perusal of Muslim bin Al-Hajaj and his book, reaching to the real reason, then, of neglecting the concept of the Promised Mahdi. It also highlights the places where Imam Al-Mahdi has been referred to in these two sources. Moreover, the paper analyzes the reasons of the forgery these two books have undergone in recent copies.
Finally, the research highlights a set of narrations about Imam Al-Mahdi (P.B.U.H), which are “correct” according to both authors’ conditions.
 

الخلاصات : ٢٠١٦/١٠/٠٣ : ٢.٩ K : ٠
: Sayed Ali Al-Musawy Al-Nasery
التعليقات:
لا توجد تعليقات.